Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors
Appearance
Please submit error reports only for content that is currently or will imminently appear on the Main Page. For general discussion about the Main Page, kindly use its talk page. |
National variations of the English language have been extensively discussed previously:
|
To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.
- Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
- Offer a correction if possible.
- References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
- Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 08:48 on 16 October 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
- Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
- Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
- No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
- Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
- Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.
Errors in the summary of the featured article
[edit]Errors with "In the news"
[edit]- In the Nobel economic item global inequality could benefit from a wikilink as one of the key terms. Brandmeistertalk 16:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- The choice of the blurb is unfortunate. We usually use the wording in the statement of the Nobel Committee, which is 'for studies of how institutions are formed and affect prosperity'. There's no notion of 'research on global inequality', and this is largely original research by The New York Times.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Errors in "Did you know ..."
[edit]- ... that Episode 7921 of Neighbours features Australia's first televised same-sex wedding since the country voted in favour of legalising same-sex marriage?
- I'm not sure the mention of Neighbours is enough to signify that Episode 7921's "first televised same-sex wedding " was the first fictional portrayal of a same-sex wedding?
- Australia voted in November 2017. Episode 7921 aired 3 September 2018.
- But... there was at least one, and possibly more, real-life televised same-sex weddings shown on Australian TV before Episode 7921 i.e., actual non-fictional ceremonies. For example, video of Christine Forster's 2 February 2018 wedding had footage aired in an episode of Australian Story on 6 February 2018.
- Maybe add "dramatised" at "first televised same-sex wedding" ie
- 'first dramatised televised same-sex wedding'? JennyOz (talk) 23:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I rather like "fictional", since it's the same in all ENGVARs (and it sidesteps the jokes about all wedding being dramatic) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I added "fictional" though it reads a tad clumsily to me, for want of a better wording. Gatoclass (talk) 08:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
China didn't make memento dollars in 1914; the image caption should say "1912 memento dollar" Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done, thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Errors in "On this day"
[edit]Errors in the summary of the featured list
[edit](October 18)
(October 21)
Errors in the summary of the featured picture
[edit]- re: Van Gogh -- In this context, "born" rather than "borne" should be used. "Borne" means "carried" or "supported" (the word is actually a past participle of the verb "to bear"). Using "born" in its place would mean "originated from" or "created as a result of", which is more apt. Even a different construction (developed, arose, stemming, flowed from, grew out of, built upon, etc.) would be more grammatically correct than as-is.
- Al Begamut, it also uses "borne" in the target article. Should you not fix that first? Schwede66 06:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think this might be one of those cases where technically the OP is correct - born was historically the correct past-participle for bear in contexts relating to the birth of something, but in modern-day usage you see plenty of instances of "borne out of", e.g. in books and on the BBC. It's a little hard to do a direct comparison, because when you search for "born out of", most of the usages relate to phrases like born out of wedlock or born out of the home, which is a different kettle of fish. Language is defined by its usage, not by any official dictum, so I'm inclined to flag this as Not done and not an error... — Amakuru (talk) 09:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I would respectfully disagree, but of course I'm a stickler for grammar, so your argument that an incorrect usage is common may well be valid. "Borne out" can be used in the sense of proof, like "the evidence bears out her supposition", but that usage isn't apt here either. I just believe the correct grammar should rule in a case like this, but that's only my position. Al Begamut (talk) 13:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also disagree.
- Lexico (ex-Oxford):
- Borne: a past participle of to bear.
- Born:
-
- 1. Brought forth by birth.
- 2. Possessing from birth the quality, circumstances, or character stated:
- a born musician; a born fool.
- 3. Native to the locale stated; immigrated to the present place from the locale stated:
- a German-born scientist; a Chicago-born New Yorker.
- -- Sca (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think this might be one of those cases where technically the OP is correct - born was historically the correct past-participle for bear in contexts relating to the birth of something, but in modern-day usage you see plenty of instances of "borne out of", e.g. in books and on the BBC. It's a little hard to do a direct comparison, because when you search for "born out of", most of the usages relate to phrases like born out of wedlock or born out of the home, which is a different kettle of fish. Language is defined by its usage, not by any official dictum, so I'm inclined to flag this as Not done and not an error... — Amakuru (talk) 09:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Al Begamut, it also uses "borne" in the target article. Should you not fix that first? Schwede66 06:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Any other Main Page errors
[edit]Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.