Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · Purge this page |
Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which may be unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or the nominator specifically requests deletion or removal and no objections are raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What not to list here[edit]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Instructions for listing files for discussion Use Twinkle. If you can't, follow these steps to do manually:
State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:
Examples of what files you may request for discussion, deletion or change here:
These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones. If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used. If you have general questions about a file and/or its copyright status, then please start a new thread at Media Copyright Questions. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Instructions for discussion participation
[edit]In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:
- Wikipedia:NFCC#1 – Free equivalent is/is not available
- Wikipedia:NFCC#8 – Significance
- Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2 – Unacceptable image use
Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.
Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons'''
, you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.
Instructions for closing discussions
[edit]Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.
Old discussions
[edit]The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:
- File:2023 Lewiston shooting.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Di (they-them) (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
We may be able to relicense this to c:template:PD-automated if it could be established that there was no human input when this image was created. Ixfd64 (talk) 15:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Status quo, keep as-is. The assertion made by PD-automated has never been tested in US court. That said, I don't see anything wrong with the non-free usage of the image. -Fastily 00:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:07-17-2016BatonRougeshooting.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The Black Revolutionary 2006 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The source is stated to be a CCTV camera. In this case, c:template:PD-automated could probably apply. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Status quo, keep as-is. The assertion made by PD-automated has never been tested in US court. That said, I don't see anything wrong with the non-free usage of the image. -Fastily 00:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
For older nominations, see the archives.
Discussions approaching conclusion
[edit]Discussions with at least 6 full days since nomination. After 7 days, they may be closed.
October 9
[edit]- File:Lexicon of the Modern Arabic Language.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zackmann08 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Poor quality. MSMST1543 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Twitter 2010 logo - from Commons.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Commons fair use upload bot (usurped) (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
We typically don't keep non-free former logos unless there is significant commentary about them. The article only has a single sentence that mentions this particular logo, which is nowhere as popular as the 2012–2023 version that we all know and love. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- This logo is important for the article (as the article mentions it). "Logos" section needs all of the former logos. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 17:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Twitter bird was released under the c:Template:Apache license, see c:Category:Twitter bird logos and File:Twitter 2010 logo.svg. ✗plicit 23:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Nice find. I wasn't aware this older bird logo was freely licensed too. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is the bird being licenced under Apache enough for this logo to be free?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Techie3 (talk) 11:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Recent nominations
[edit]October 10
[edit]- File:Tenta-as-Sumotori.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bobak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I originally tagged this as replaceable fair use, but it was contested by the uploader with the following rationale: "The subject, a notable professional wrestler who died in 2006, was a rikishi for 9 months in Japan (Nov '85 to Jul '86); this tag presumes that it was enough time to gestate some random person in Japan taking a photo of Makushita (third division) bout of a the sumo equivalent of a minor-league player. Respectfully, the assumption that there would be a free version of this available from that brief window (on film) seems to be a bit of a reach."
This is a textbook violation of WP:NFCC#1. Free alternatives of the subject exist (see c:Category:John Tenta). We do not need a non-free image of him in a sumo ring to understand that he was a briefly a sumo wrestler. ✗plicit 00:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- The subject, a notable professional wrestler who competed from 1987-2004 and died in 2006, was a rikishi for 9 months in Japan (Nov '85 to Jul '86), almost entirely an unknown at that level. This tag for "no free equivalent" presumes 9-months in the 1980s was enough time to gestate some random person in Japan taking a photo of Makushita (third division) bout of a the sumo equivalent of a minor-league player. Respectfully, the assumption that there would be a free version of this available from that brief window (on film) seems to be a bit of a reach. In theory, could there be such a photo? Yes. Is it ever likely to surface? Unlikely. I'm not sure if this tag was meant to foreclose all situations where the likelihood of finding a non-free equivalent is possible. Wikipedia has articles of rikishi, it's still an interesting aspect of his life. I get that some Wikipedians are deletionists and are passionate about removing things, but I respectfully ask for it to be kept. --Bobak (talk)
- File:Frontier Corps Logos.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wallu2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file shows the emblems of the 3 subunits of the Frontier Corps. As the article already used File:FC main logo.jpg as the main representation, the file is redundant and should be used in the separate articles (at Frontier Corps Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (North), Frontier Corps Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (South), Frontier Corps Balochistan (North) and Frontier Corps Balochistan (South)).
The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#3a, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Dartmouth mermaid.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jh1706 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the United States. This sculpture was erected in 2005 and is therefore too recent to be in public domain due to age. Photo is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
October 11
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Title Card for Chicken Shop Date (2014).jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SushiSaahimi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
IMDb images are not automatically in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:Alexandre Tarsaidze.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GeorgaOnMy Mind (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexandre Tarsaidze.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, based on the Deletion request on Commons I've changed the licensing to Non-free biog-pic and added a fair use. Salavat (talk) 06:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete as a copyright violation.. Whpq (talk) 13:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Geraldine High School.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TemukaBag (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Tagged with {{PD-because}} with the reason "school logo." However, my understanding is school logos are not exempt from copyright in New Zealand. Only used in draft space. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as DB-9 they clearly do reserve their copyright rights: [1] Traumnovelle (talk) 08:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:Pied piper poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Belrien12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Tagged with {{PD-because}} with the reason "the film was made in 1933." However, corporate works are copyrighted for 95 years. This poster may be in public domain for other reasons, but this requires evidence. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think that poster would stay because Disney's pied piper short is old and is now in public domain and I have almost forgotten that I uploaded this poster into its Wikipedia page until now. So I think this poster would stay. Belrien12 (talk) 07:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Except as far as my research goes, The Pied Piper is still under copyright until 2029. The poster may be public domain though since I don't see a copyright notice on it (difficult to tell if IMDb has all of the poster though.) Abzeronow (talk) 02:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Relicense as fair use. Abzeronow's explanation is correct. The film has a valid copyright notice on it, and it's likely under copyright until 2029, unless Disney neglected to renew the copyright (which is unlikely). This image may be public domain, but we'd need more information about the poster to evaluate its status. hinnk (talk) 12:17, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Group Portrait of the staff of the Auckland Public Library with John Barr in the centre C1930.jpg
[edit]- File:Group Portrait of the staff of the Auckland Public Library with John Barr in the centre C1930.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Izzy lib (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Certainly not required to illustrate the article Epsom Library. The image might be public domain but I can't find the original record from Auckland Libraries to confirm that.
There is a free image of John Barr on Commons so fails NFCC#1 as well. File:1937_New_Zealand_Library_Association_Conference_in_Wellington.jpg Traumnovelle (talk) 08:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Kingsley's Chicken Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dfadden (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Uploaded for Kingsley's Chicken. No other use. Can be restored if said article is moved to mainspace. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 11:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Minorax. Thanks for bringing this here. Back in April, I requested the deleted article be restored/userfied by User:MBisanz who closed out the deletion discussion in 2016. I believe that there has now been broader coverage and the rational for deletion would not still apply. Unfortunately, this user is inactive so nothing has yet come of it. I will now pursue with an admin or other appropriate user in order to get an answer on this as soon as possible. I appreciate that it can be restored later if the article is moved, but if there is a prospect that the article may be restored, it would seem premature to do so, especially as it is tagged as public domain and therefore free use. Dfadden (talk) 21:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Loch 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nup~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Low-quality image replaceable with numerous higher-quality images at c:Category:Jovibarba globifera. This one also has questionable licensing – it is attributed to "Manuel Werner, Nürtingen, Germany", but there is no evidence that this is the uploader.
In particular, the use at Hen and chicken plant can be replaced with File:Jovibarba globifera x 01.JPG. The use at Hen and chicks can be replaced with File:Hens and Chicks growing amid other succulents.jpg (which is already on the page in the gallery section). The use at Jovibarba can be replaced with File:Hen & Chicks (succulent plant).jpg. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 16:11, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, maybe transfer to Commons. The uploader's name is Manuel and they are from Germany, at least according to their introduction. Seems reasonable to assume they were trying to upload it as {{Self}}. hinnk (talk) 12:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I missed that; thank you, hinnk! I do not think this is eligible for Commons because it is one of the final 3 images tagged as {{assumed license}} (which is what brought this file to my attention). c:COM:GOF might apply, though it was not uploaded to Commons before the cutoff date?I still think we should delete this image because there are higher-resolution images – without questionable licensing – available to replace it. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at the pages that use c:Template:Assumed license, it seems like eligible images have been transferred over within the past few years (e.g. File:La Barca Condado.jpg) which makes me think we'd be good to do the same with this one.
- I agree that there are probably better images that could be used. My suggestion to keep (at Commons) is mostly because the image still falls within scope and it'd preserve the file history for anyone who's reused it in the 20 years since it was uploaded. hinnk (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Happy to move to Commons and make the replacements locally. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I missed that; thank you, hinnk! I do not think this is eligible for Commons because it is one of the final 3 images tagged as {{assumed license}} (which is what brought this file to my attention). c:COM:GOF might apply, though it was not uploaded to Commons before the cutoff date?I still think we should delete this image because there are higher-resolution images – without questionable licensing – available to replace it. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Missing license information, plain and simple. File was uploaded with no license and a bogus license was added by someone else. -Fastily 07:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:WRP 2001 Chisholm-Smoke.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wildfireupdateman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Tagged with {{PD-because}} with the reason "it is in the Alberta government public wildfire research website." However, works by the Canadian government are not automatically in public domain. The source website's copyright terms indicate what is equivalent to a CC BY-NC-ND license. Image is not used in article space. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 08:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Dragon Age Dreadwolf Logo 2022.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sariel Xilo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#1 and #8. This is the former logo displaying the title of a video game whose title was later changed to Dragon Age: The Veilguard. Because the image displays only the game's former title, its meaning can readily be conveyed by text, and the image does not aid the understanding of the topic. The logo, as such, is not discussed in the game's article. Sandstein 18:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete It's not really helpful to explain anything that can't be said in the article body. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Raqqacivilcouncil.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AntonSamuel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No standalone article. Usage does not increase reader's knowledge. Fails WP:NFCC8. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Tabqacivilcouncil.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AntonSamuel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No standalone article. Usage does not increase reader's knowledge. Fails WP:NFCC8. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Manbijcivilcouncil.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AntonSamuel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No standalone article. Usage does not increase reader's knowledge. Fails WP:NFCC8. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Deirezzorcivilcouncil.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AntonSamuel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No standalone article. Usage does not increase reader's knowledge. Fails WP:NFCC8. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Sayyid ummar bafaqi.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DelphiLore (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious claim of own work - appears to be AI generated from something like the original file at ml:File:Sayed Ummer Bafakhy.jpg — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: There was some recent discussion about this type of image at WT:IUP#AI-generated images of people and the rough (unofficial) consensus seems to be that they shouldn't be allowed not only because of potential copyright violations but also for encyclopedic reasons. If the other Malayalam Wikipedia file mentioned above by JJMC89 is really the same person and its provenance is sound, then perhaps it could be uploaded locally to Wikipedia as non-free (if still protected by copyright) or to Commons (if within the public domain or otherwise freely licensed). -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Km sahib.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DelphiLore (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious claim of own work - previously tagged with {{permission pending}} as if it were someone else's work; appears to be AI generated — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
October 12
[edit]- File:Utas Men 2023.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 2001atlas10 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Source website does not indicate image is in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 08:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Pokken Tournament Chandelure.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PrimalMustelid (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Image currently serves a purely decorative use in the article; it does not aid significantly with understanding the commentary it is attached to, and is overall not necessary for understanding the subject overall. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Fleetwood Mac - Say You Love Me.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dawnseeker2000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
De-PRODded per rationale about the sample's usefulness and necessity for readers to recognize the song. I still have reservations about the sample. Other media can play the whole song legitimately and legally and can do the same roles that the sample does. Secondly, from my (re-)reading of "contextual significance" criterion and NFC guideline's clarity of "contextual significance and the song article using the sample, the sample is supposed to clarify what the whole article says about the song.
Hearing the whole chorus over and over within the sample, I fail to see how the descriptions about and receptions toward the song fail to be contextually understood without the sample. Furthermore, I'm unconvinced that a small sample suffices to contextually signify the song. The whole article already suffices to make the whole song contextually significant, making this sample unnecessary. Even the song title and the band name already suffice also. George Ho (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Sw15sept2001.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by T bone (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file is a scan of the Socialist Worker (published in the UK), in which File:Socialist Worker front page.jpg already exists to serve as the main depiction. Being redundant except for showing the newspaper's old format (which is just another illustration that can be omitted), the file fails WP:NFCC#3a, and should be therefore deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
October 13
[edit]- File:UWGeorge Hopper.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nategg23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the United States. This sculpture was created in 1993 [2] and is therefore too recent to be in public domain due to age. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:24, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
October 14
[edit]- File:8 Parche.jpg Baani Sandhu.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Monophile (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused album cover, missing evidence the copyright holder has released it under a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Screenshot from film Wild Dog Dingo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Altenmann (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the Cast section of The Wild Dog Dingo. The image fails WP:NFCC#3a since the poster already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 22:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- keep the poster is useless to understanding of the film hence NFCC#3a is not violated. If you insist, I may happily delete the primitive poster. The discussed image is crucial to understand the teenage love drama hence NFCC#8 is OK. It says more than thousand words written by a wikipedian. We do not do critical commentaries on screentshots, so this criticism is irrelevant. "does nothing to increase" is a personal opinion. I think otherwise, that's why I added it. --Altenmann >talk 23:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
October 15
[edit]- File:Legoland Reserve 'N' Ride Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by VarietyEditor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Used in 4 articles but usage fails WP:NFCC8 as none of it is a primary topic and it's only used to indicate "Reserve 'N' Ride available" --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:NHL Logo former.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kalel2007 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The old, former NHL (National Hockey League) logo is tagged with {{PD-US-expired-abroad}}, which disallows transfer to Commons. On the contrary, if the old logo debuted in 1946, this old logo's copyright wasn't renewed in 1973 or 1974. If it debuted in 1918, the logo might've or would've been all right to use in Commons. The logo itself uses plainly "NHL" not in the context of a literary work, such as Bambi, a Life in the Woods of the 1996 Twin Books court case. Furthermore, just plain (Latin) letters have been used (Cornell). Moreover, no evidence/proof that this logo is neither an American nor a Canadian work has been made. Should be transferred to Commons in either case. George Ho (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Past logos of NHL: link. George Ho (talk) 18:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
October 16
[edit]- File:DavidFeldman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fws10170 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused, possibly out of scope or non-notable person. The main article was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David N. Feldman. 146.196.41.141 (talk) 07:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Today is October 16 2024. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 October 16 – (new nomination)
If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.
Please ensure "===October 16===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.
The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.