Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red!
Home | Article alerts | Essays | Events | Ideas & planning | Images | Join | Metrics | Outreach | Redlist index | Research | Resources | Showcase | Social media | Tools & tech |
Find us ... | |
---|---|
Here: | |
or at | https://w.wiki/347 |
About
[edit]Welcome to Women in Red (WiR)! We are a group of volunteer (unpaid) editors of all genders who live around the world and speak dozens of languages. Across different language Wikipedias, we focus on reducing systemic bias regarding gender representation (content gender gap) in the Wikipedia movement. Our goal is to "move the needle" in terms of statistical representation of women and other gender minorities on Wikipedia. We recognized a need for this work in 2014 when we learned that, as of October 2014, only 15.53% of English Wikipedia's biographies were about women.[1] Without a particular percentage in mind, we recognized that with persistence, we could increase it, one article at a time. With only this in mind, Women in Red was established in July 2015, at Wikimania Mexico City, by Roger Bamkin and Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight.
According to Humaniki, the percentage of women's biographies on the English Wikipedia has reached 19.95% as of 7 October 2024. That means that of 2,027,997 biographies, only 404,670 are about women.[2] Not impressed? "Content gender gap" is a form of systemic bias, and WiR addresses it in a positive way through shared values.
Can we increase the percentage still further? Yes! But we need you in order to do so. How? There are more than 34,000 general forum comments from over 1,200 different editors on our talkpage.[3] Ask there. You don't have to be a member in order to participate in the conversations; just please be civil.
Do the articles have to be perfect when they are created? No. But establishing them according to Wikipedia's policies is the first step, and that's the focus of Women in Red: new article creation. Over time, other editors will improve these articles; maybe that's you.
Where the work is done
[edit]On Wikipedia
[edit]Our Wikipedia WikiProject focuses on creating content regarding women's biographies, women's works, and women's issues. Our editors create articles in many different language Wikipedias. The objective is to turn "redlinks" (like this one) into blue ones. That's why we are called "Women in Red".
We take an inclusive view towards subject matter, editors, and language communities:
- Editors: We do not focus on the gender of the editor. Anyone/everyone is welcome to be a member, participant, enthusiast of Women in Red. If you participate in WiR, you can join up officially using the box in the top right-hand corner of this page. You are also welcome to add our userbox template
{{User WikiProject Women in Red}}
to your user page, to produce:
|
- Language communities: While Women in Red began on English Wikipedia, it is an international commitment with dozens of other language communities. Please add a link to your language's coordination page here.
- Subject matter:
- If the subject of the article self-identifies as a woman, a non-binary person, and/or any other gender minority, that person is included within the scope of Women in Red. Historic cases where it's unknown how they self-identified also count. The goal of the project is to increase inclusion, and we'd rather not block article subjects from being included in an article creation drive.
- In addition to creating new articles, we create and maintain hundreds of lists of "missing" notable women. Some of these women have an article on some language Wikipedia, while others have no article in any Wikipedia. We call these lists, "redlists".
- Click on our Redlinks index to see our lists of missing articles by focus area, occupation and nationality. Like everything else on Wikipedia, this is incomplete, so feel free to add pertinent items to our crowd-sourced lists.
- While all redlists have redlinks, our redlists are generated in numerous ways:
- crowd-sourced (example, Crafts)
- Wikidata-generated (example, Herpetologists)
- based on a dictionary or other reference book (example, Encyclopédie Larousse)
- based on a website (example, BBC 100 Women)
- based on an international Authority Control (example, VIAF)
Wikimedia Commons
[edit]Every year, our members upload thousands of images to Wikimedia Commons: photographs of women, their signatures, their works, etc. In turn, these images can be added to Wikipedia articles. This is another way people can be involved in improving women's representation on Wikipedia. Over 10,000 new images were added in 2022.
Wikidata
[edit]We create and improve Wikidata items related to women, women's works, and women's issues.
Announcements
[edit]- Please post recent announcements directly on this page for improved page editing history, watcher alerts and greater visibility
Add new announcements to the top. Sign with ~~~~. Remove old ones after a couple of months.
- New redlists: Internet Speculative Fiction Database, Universal Lithuanian Encyclopedia, A Historical Dictionary of British Women, American Women Artists, Past and Present, Dictionary of Wisconsin History, Italian Women Writers, Mujeres de Nuestra Tierra (Argentina), Representative Women of New England, Encyclopedia of China
Events
[edit]- For a complete list of events, visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Events.
Ongoing initiatives
New for this month
Recently completed
Upcoming events
None to display.
Lists of red links
[edit]WiR works by filling in missing articles based on extensive lists of needed topics. The index to our wide range of topics and nationalities can be found at the Redlist index. Please make these red links blue. Notable women without a Wikipedia biography can be added to any crowd-sourced redlists they match; and added to wikidata such that they're included in wikidata-derived redlists. We also have a guide to adding names to redlists, and to creating new redlists.
Article alerts
[edit]- See Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women for articles about women that are nominated for deletion.
- This section is a transcluded subpage, and may contain more information than is shown here. To view or edit, go to /Article alerts (watch this section).
- Note: This report is based on the {{WIR}} banners of WikiProject Women in Red. If an article isn't listed here, first verify that it has one of those banners. If it has another women-related banner, like {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}} or {{WikiProject Women scientists}}, look on those projects' article alert pages instead.
Did you know
- 13 Oct 2024 – Veiqia (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Lajmmoore (t · c); see discussion
- 13 Oct 2024 – Ragnvi Torslow (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by MumphingSquirrel (t · c); see discussion
- 12 Oct 2024 – Kiki Wong (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Jonathan Deamer (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Oct 2024 – Chili Williams (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Cbl62 (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Oct 2024 – Victoria Roshchyna (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by GreenLipstickLesbian (t · c); see discussion
- 10 Oct 2024 – Maria Muntañola Cvetković (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Miraclepine (t · c); see discussion
- 05 Oct 2024 – Margaret C. Waites (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Innisfree987 (t · c); see discussion
- 03 Oct 2024 – Grizel Niven (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Cielquiparle (t · c); see discussion
- 03 Oct 2024 – Margaret Pargeter (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Cielquiparle (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Oct 2024 – Viriamo (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Lajmmoore (t · c); see discussion
- (13 more...)
Articles for deletion
- 15 Oct 2024 – Atmaprajnananda Saraswati (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bobby Cohn (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- 15 Oct 2024 – Beach Hut F.C. (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Demt1298 (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 15 Oct 2024 – Sarah Walker (television presenter) (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by TeapotsOfDoom (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- 14 Oct 2024 – Thabiso Sikwane (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Pitille02 (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 14 Oct 2024 – Dana Kochavi (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Pitille02 (t · c); see discussion (8 participants)
- 14 Oct 2024 – Jessica Reed Kraus (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Ibjaja055 (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- 14 Oct 2024 – Josette Baisse (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Yusuf Michael (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- 13 Oct 2024 – Louise Glover (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Svenska356 (t · c); see discussion (7 participants)
- 13 Oct 2024 – Feli Ferraro (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by QuietHere (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- 13 Oct 2024 – Hala Rharrit (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by The Mountain of Eden (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- (78 more...)
Proposed deletions
- 12 Oct 2024 – Maryam Afifa Ansari (talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by 87.240.233.193 (t · c): No credible source was cited, apart from a media article, regarding the extraordinary claim of being the first women neurosurgeon in India
- 07 Oct 2024 – Atmaprajnananda Saraswati (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Bobby Cohn (t · c) was deproded by Liz (t · c) on 14 Oct 2024
Good article nominees
- 14 Oct 2024 – Marina Kondratyeva (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Gerda Arendt (t · c); start discussion
- 13 Oct 2024 – Tabyana Ali (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (t · c); start discussion
- 07 Oct 2024 – Deolinda Rodrigues (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Spookyaki (t · c); start discussion
- 04 Oct 2024 – Shadia Abu Ghazaleh (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
- 07 Sep 2024 – Pat Gros (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Mujinga (t · c); start discussion
- 16 Jun 2024 – Augustina Gabel (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by GnocchiFan (t · c); see discussion
- 07 Jun 2024 – Alexandra Kiroi-Bogatyreva (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Riley1012 (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 10 Jun 2024 – Palopa (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to LGBT rights in Papua New Guinea by Rainsage (t · c); see discussion
Articles for creation
- 10 Sep 2024 – Draft:C. Antoinette Wood (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by JosieMarieCarter (t · c)
- 04 Sep 2024 – Draft:Susan Moulton McMaster (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by AlbertaHistory (t · c)
- 31 Aug 2024 – Draft:Camille Morel (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Phalaenopsisis (t · c)
- 28 Aug 2024 – Draft:Stefani Engelstein (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by StellaMadeleine (t · c)
- 22 Apr 2024 – Draft:Alexandra Bernhardt (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Takeru Watanabe (t · c)
- 06 Oct 2024 – Draft:Alice Elizabeth Louisa Melliss (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Cyanochic (t · c) was moved to Alice Elizabeth Louisa Melliss (talk · edit · hist) by Thilsebatti (t · c) on 14 Oct 2024
- 08 Sep 2024 – Draft:Rayne Rouce (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Allthemilescombined1 (t · c) was accepted to Rayne Rouce (talk · edit · hist) by Thilsebatti (t · c) on 12 Oct 2024
Declined drafts
[edit]Thanks firstly to Ronhjones, and now to Galobtter, we have a bot showing declined drafts submitted to AfC. Weekly updates highlight those most recently listed under New Additions. With a little bit of attention, some of them could well be moved to mainspace, encouraging the editors who created them to progress on Wikipedia.
Resources and research
[edit]WiR maintains resources to help you contribute, including lists of topical books and external links, information on editing in general, and contacts you can reach out to for specific needs. They can be found at Resources.
Academic research on Wikipedia's content gender gap is also documented at Research.
Metrics
[edit]- This section is a transcluded subpage, containing more information than is shown here. To view detailed month-by-month results or to edit, go to Metrics.
About: additional details
[edit]The articles created for any month, including the current month, can be displayed by clicking on one of the months in the archive box.
We track the articles we create each month. Reports bot updates these lists automatically, but you can manually add and annotate entries. The bot will remove non-existent pages. More details about the bot. Our metrics talkpage is here: Metrics talkpage
The evolving list for this month (see Archives box) is created by the bot which lists new women's biographies on the basis of their female gender on Wikidata. At present, the bot does not list women's works, associations or related articles but you are encouraged to add these to the list manually. A WiR Wikidata page provides information on how you can help ensure WiR metrics are up-to-date.
The graph shows the number of articles created each month. The apparent decrease for the current month reflects the number of articles created up to today's date. Only data on completed months indicate overall progress.
For personal metrics on how many articles you've created about women, see this tool.
If you want to measure gender diversity in a given Wikipedia article, use this tool.
Totals at a glance
[edit]Year | Portion if applicable |
Total | Daily average |
---|---|---|---|
2015 | 18 Jul – 31 Dec | 11,711 | 70 |
2016 | 28,399 | 77 | |
2017 | 28,271 | 77 | |
2018 | 27,323 | 75 | |
2019 | 27,207 | 75 | |
2020 | 30,119 | 82 | |
2021 | 26,780 | 73 | |
2022 | 18,893 | 52 | |
2023 | 17,925 | 49 | |
2024 | |||
Grand total | 216,628 |
Updated: Rosiestep (talk) 17:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Summary of Women in Red statistics from main page
[edit]Date | Women | Bios | Percentage | Increase in % for year |
Increase in Women for year |
Increase in Bios for year |
Percentage for year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30-Sep-2015 | 205,814 | 1,299,047 | 15.84% | ||||
1-Jan-2017 | 240,445 | 1,432,907 | 16.78% | 0.94% | 34,631 | 133,860 | 25.87% |
1-Jan-2018 | 262,099 | 1,509,348 | 17.37% | 0.58% | 21,654 | 76,441 | 28.33% |
31-Dec-2018 | 279,959 | 1,573,341 | 17.79% | 0.43% | 17,860 | 63,993 | 27.91% |
30-Dec-2019 | 305,072 | 1,678,323 | 18.18% | 0.38% | 25,113 | 104,982 | 23.92% |
11-Jan-2021 | 332,622 | 1,778,126 | 18.71% | 0.53% | 27,550 | 99,803 | 27.60% |
3-Jan-2022 | 356,439 | 1,865,516 | 19.11% | 0.40% | 23,817 | 87,390 | 27.25% |
2-Jan-2023 | 373,263 | 1,921,359 | 19.43% | 0.32% | 16,824 | 55,843 | 30.13% |
1-Jan-2024 | 390,207 | 1,978,991 | 19.72% | 0.29% | 16,944 | 57,632 | 29.40% |
Total | 184,393 | 679,944 | 27.12% |
Note: the September 2015 figure was reported here.
Updated by: TSventon (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Further background on metrics
[edit]As a result of figures presented by Humaniki, we keep posting on the main Women in Red page the percentage of women's biographies on the English version of Wikipedia. Increases are steady but marginal: for example from July 2022 to July 2023, the percentage has risen from around 19.3% to around 19.6%.
Thanks to an analysis presented by Andrew Gray on the WIR talk page, it certainly looks as if the number of men and women involved in sports has a significant influence on the statistics for women. A detailed account of Gray's work is presented in "Gender and BLPs on Wikipedia, redux", which he published on 2 August 2023.
The two lists below show that biographies of living people (BLPs) born in recent years are approximately 50% female if data on all categories of athletes are excluded. By contrast, the equivalent overall figures (including athletes) are only around 25%. As a result, biographies of very large numbers of male sportspeople seem to be responsible for the huge difference. Andrew Gray's detailed lists below document how figures for BLPs by year of birth have evolved over the years:
Overall development of BLPs since the 1920s for all biographies
- Missing birth year BLPs – 150,574, of which 53,355 female – 35.4%
- 1920s birth BLPs – 5,096, of which 1,325 female – 26.0%
- 1930s birth BLPs – 39,055, of which 7,086 female – 18.1%
- 1940s birth BLPs – 95,602, of which 18,495 female – 19.3%
- 1950s birth BLPs – 128,518, of which 27,172 female – 21.1%
- 1960s birth BLPs – 145,300, of which 33,390 female – 23.0%
- 1970s birth BLPs – 150,539, of which 37,893 female – 25.2%
- 1980s birth BLPs – 171,072, of which 42,880 female – 25.1%
- 1990s birth BLPs – 150,880, of which 36,944 female – 24.5%
- 2000s birth BLPs – 30,042, of which 7,542 female – 25.1%
Development of BLPs since the 1920s for biographies excluding athletes
If we discount all athletes using the infobox method, the results are:
- Missing birth year BLPs – 140,177, of which 51,021 female – 36.4%
- 1920s birth BLPs – 4,321, of which 1,228 female – 28.4%
- 1930s birth BLPs – 28,978, of which 6,161 female – 21.2%
- 1940s birth BLPs – 73,095, of which 16,566 female – 22.7%
- 1950s birth BLPs – 95,893, of which 23,644 female – 24.7%
- 1960s birth BLPs – 96,175, of which 26,632 female – 27.8%
- 1970s birth BLPs – 81,682, of which 27,562 female – 33.7%
- 1980s birth BLPs – 58,078, of which 24,816 female – 42.7%
- 1990s birth BLPs – 23,281, of which 11,754 female – 50.5%
- 2000s birth BLPs – 2,850, of which 1,539 female – 54.0%
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Showcase
[edit]WiR is amazing and has way too much to showcase here. Please see Showcase for our recent and past achievements.
Recent Did You Know? blurbs
[edit]These are the 20 most recent WP:DYK entries for WiR. Updated approximately weekly by User:JL-Bot.
- ... that cyclist Daniela Larreal competed in five Olympic games for a country that later exiled her? (2024-10-12)
- ... that despite having no university training, Agnes Crane described a new species of brachiopod in 1886? (2024-10-12)
- ... that Victoria Siddall is the first woman to be appointed the director of the 168-year-old National Portrait Gallery in London? (2024-10-11)
- ... that voice actress Atsuko Tanaka often named pandas? (2024-10-09)
- ... that some of the work of lesbian feminist filmmaking pioneer Norma Bahia Pontes is lost media? (2024-10-07)
- ... that Mokulubete Makatisi placed eighth at the 2022 Commonwealth Games women's marathon despite running in new shoes that she had received late during the race? (2024-10-07)
- ... that Tuhi Martukaw led youth delegations to the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues for ten years in a row? (2024-10-05)
- ... that Elham Mahamid Ruzin, a blind Muslim Arab, won a silver medal for Israel at the 2024 Paris Paralympics? (2024-10-03)
- ... that Shoko Ikeda once admitted that Haruhi Suzumiya, a character she designed, was "just like me"? (2024-10-01)
- ... that Ajah Pritchard-Lolo is Vanuatu's first Olympic weightlifter? (2024-10-01)
- ... that English amateur geologist Charlotte Eyton wrote a number of papers and pamphlets on the geology of the Wrekin, a part of Shropshire, between 1862 and 1870? (2024-09-30)
- ... that Joanna Ferrone served as the business manager for the fictional character Fido Dido? (2024-09-21)
- ... that Alexina Kublu, a linguist, translator, Languages Commissioner, and the first justice of the peace in Nunavut, is her grandmother's father and her daughter's son, as per the Inuit namesake tradition? (2024-09-21)
- ... that Nicole Chang-Leng has been described as a "daughter" of the Seychelles? (2024-09-17)
- ... that Dorothy Stanley was once said to be one of the last speakers of the Miwok languages? (2024-09-13)
- ... that a contemporary adaptation of "The Snow Queen" contains feminist elements and, according to one scholar, violates gender expectations? (2024-09-12)
- ... that USA Boxing's head coach said that Olympian Jajaira Gonzalez's return to boxing was "like Lazarus coming back from the dead"? (2024-09-11)
- ... that Mary Jo West compared working in network TV news to learning that Santa Claus is just an ordinary man? (2024-09-10)
- ... that Greenlandic content creator Qupanuk Olsen petitioned the Inatsisartut to move Greenland's time zone to UTC−03:00? (2024-09-09)
- ... that Ana Sigüenza was the first woman to be the general secretary of a national trade union center in Spain? (2024-09-08)
Transcluding 20 of 2782 total
Press
[edit]There has been considerable press coverage of WiR, to the point where the project has its own Wikipedia article. Below are some recent articles. To add articles to the list, visit Press.
- Wikipedia Donations Go Toward Embedding Feminism And Racial Justice In World’s Largest Encyclopedia, by Robert Schmad, Daily Caller (not considered reliable), 23 September 2024
- Niagara resident named Wikimedian of the Year, by Richard Hutton, Thorold Today, 19 August 2024
- "This Researcher Is on a Crusade to Correct Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance", by Katie Hafner and Sophie McNulty, Scientific American, 30 July 2024
- "Less than 20 per cent of Wikipedia bios are on women. These Wikipedians want to change that.", by Olivia Cleal, Women's Agenda, 30 July 2024
- "‘Women in Red’: PennWest prof helps close gender gap in Wikipedia entries", by Paul Paterra, Observer-Reporter, 8 July 2024
- "This Canadian Non-Profit Is Helping To Fix Wikipedia’s Diversity Gap", by Maureen Halushak, Chatelaine, 17 June 2024
- "Wikipedia is also affected by the gender gap", Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, 3 May 2024
- " Georgetown hosts Wikipedia edit-a-thon, harnessing anger into action", by Julia Vasilj, The Georgetown Voice, 14 April 2024
- "Wikipedia Needs More Women: Bridging The Gender Gap In Knowledge Representation", Africa.com, 5 April 2024
- "Wikimedia Foundation launches ‘Wikipedia Needs More Women’ campaign" by Josephine Agbonkhese, Vanguard, 8 March 2024
- "On International Women’s Day, Wikimedia Foundation celebrates efforts in Africa to improve gender equity on Wikipedia", The Sun, 8 March 2024
- "Int'l Women's Day: Wikimedia launches 'Wikipedia needs more women' campaign", Business Standard, 8 March 2024
- "Wikipedia needs more women. And India can help bridge this gender gap" by Anusha Alikhan, The Print, 8 March 2024
- "The Guardian view on Wikipedia’s female volunteers: a hive heroism that changes history", editorial, The Guardian, 8 March 2024, also in connection with Lucy Moore
- "UK academic’s Wikipedia project raises profile of women around the world", by Robyn Vinter on Wikipedian Lucy Moore, The Guardian, 5 March 2024
- "Review highlights gender gap on Wikipedia", by University of Barcelone, Phys.org, 5 March 2024
- "What a Wikipedia page can do for women in STEM", by Olivia Clear, womensagenda.com.au, 11 October 2023
- "‘Why are they not on Wikipedia?’: Dr Jess Wade’s mission for recognition for unsung scientists", by Donna Ferguson, The Observer, 1 October 2023
- "Some Things I Like About the Expanding Wikipedia Universe", by Hilda Bastian, Absolutely Maybe (PLOS) blog, 2 August 2023
- "Bestselling author Kate Mosse urges budding historians and writers to add more biographies of women to Wikipedia", by Fiona Parker, Daily Mail, 3 July 2023
- "The British physicist making women scientists visible online", article about Jess Wade by Anna Cuenca, Phys Org, 20 April 2023
- "Social Scientists Can’t Ignore the Power of Wikipedia—or Its Systemic Biases", by Mariah John-Leighton and Hannah Jane Pearson, London School of Economics and Political Science, 6 April 2023
- "Wheres Russo?" Sky Sports profile Lewes FC including Women in Red Barnstar winner James Boyes 31 March 2023
- "Closing Wikipedia’s Gender Gap, One Edit at a Time", by Sara Norberg, Tufts Now, 27 March 2023
- Nature asks 6 to comment on their plans for International Women's Day including Jess Wade.
- "Majority of Wikipedia editors are still men - so how is the online encyclopaedia addressing the issue?", Evening Standard, 8 March 2023.
- "Lewes FC is delighted that our own volunteer club photographer James Boyes has received a ‘Barnstar’ award from Women in Red, and is indeed the only person to receive one in 2022."
Academia
[edit]In addition to listings under Research, academic papers on gender bias in Wikipedia (as recorded in Wikidata) are listed in Scholia.
To include a paper, create an item about it on Wikidata (check first to avoid duplicates) and give it main subject (P921) = gender bias on Wikipedia (Q17002416).
References
[edit]- ^ Graells-Garrido, Eduardo; Lalmas, Mounia; Menczer, Filippo (2015). "First Women, Second Sex: Gender Bias in Wikipedia". Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media - HT '15: 165–174. arXiv:1502.02341. doi:10.1145/2700171.2791036. S2CID 1082360.
- ^ "Humaniki".
- ^ "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red • en.wikipedia.org". XTools.
External links
[edit]- Women in Red on Twitter
- Interest in women's history began much earlier than is assumed, Phys Org, August 25, 2015
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|